News & Events

Solar Leases PA Update for Landowners

by | Jan 14, 2020 | Agricultural Law, Industry News, Kiessling, Jacob H, Real Estate & Land Use

Update on Solar Leases in Pennsylvania and Further Landowner Considerations

Solar Panel Leases - Land Owners

By:  Jacob H. Kiessling, Esq.

In July 2019, I published an article entitled “Solar Leases: Landowners Beware,” which was in response to an increase in calls from landowners across the Commonwealth regarding solar lease proposals. Over the past six months, the prevalence of solar proposals has continued to increase. The prior article discussed a number of central issues, including decommissioning requirements and security, determination of lease areas, and minimum acreage requirements. As mentioned in that article, however, those topics barely scratch the surface of the legal issues contained in a solar lease. This article addresses a few additional topics prevalent in most solar leases that are important to landowners.

One of the most inconsistent provisions found in the majority of solar leases is the timing and clarity of the various “stages” of the lease term and the payment obligations of the company which are tied to those stages. Often times, in addition to or in lieu of an “option period” (the period during which the company has an option or right to lease the property), a lease will provide for a “development period” and/or a “construction period” which precede the “operations period.” These early periods will sometimes appear to last for only a few years, but upon careful inspection, actually begin and end upon the occurrence of future events which are out of the landowner’s control and may never occur, resulting in an indiscernible lease term. More importantly, the company’s payment obligations are often determined by the current period of the lease term. During the development or construction period, the company’s payment obligations are only a few thousand dollars per year. Once construction begins and the construction period is underway, the property is no longer available for farming and, once again, most leases provide no meaningful payment to the landowner. The obligation to make rent payments based on the property acreage does not begin until the future operations period, which may or may not occur. Under these terms, a landowner could find himself many years into a lease with restrictions on the use and ownership of the property, but with no meaningful compensation and no right to terminate the lease. If construction has begun, the landowner may be losing additional years of income with no reasonable expectation of compensation from the company. The periods comprising the term of the lease must be properly negotiated to set maximum time limits in order to protect the landowner’s financial interests and to encourage the company to diligently endeavor to construct and operate a solar facility.

Related to the lease term “periods” are the rights of and permitted uses by the company during those periods. Most solar leases and options confer significant rights to the company during the option and development periods without reciprocal protections for the landowner. For example, most leases and options allow the company to apply for government approvals and permits or to rezone or reclassify the property during the early periods, which may result in the landowner’s rights with respect to the use of the property being materially changed. These rights are exercisable by the company prior to ever even committing to construct a solar facility on the property.

Another lease provision that needs to be carefully negotiated is the parties’ obligations with respect to property taxes. A typical lease will impose the obligation to pay property taxes on the landowner, including taxes attributable to the value of the solar facility. A properly negotiated lease should require the company to pay all property taxes attributable to their improvements, the underlying ground they occupy, and any other increases above the current assessment of the property. Likewise, the lease should impose the burden on the company to pay roll-back or recapture taxes which result from the inevitable disqualification of the property from Clean and Green or any other preferential tax assessment program. Although distinct from property tax, the lease should also require the company to pay all realty transfer taxes assessed as a result of the execution of the lease.

Engaging an attorney experienced in solar lease negotiations to review and negotiate a solar lease is essential to avoid the many potential pitfalls of a solar lease. Mette, Evans & Woodside’s attorneys have extensive experience reviewing and negotiating solar and other alternative energy leases and can work with you to ensure that you and your land are protected.

Read the first article in this series: Solar Leases: Landowners Beware